The Russian Navy has had to back off its plan to develop nuclear-powered, Lider-class destroyers in recent years. There’s also the chance that the project is being promoted as a symbolic demonstration of the propagandistic symbolism behind it. The reason for this may be that Russia’s super-submarines are larger and have more missiles than the US’s. It would be more cost effective to build only two completely new, modern submarines. military is equipped with cruise missiles, such as the Kalibr, they are extremely expensive. Russia would also need to develop new combat systems and sensors.ĭespite the fact that the U.S. Russia’s titanium capabilities may have been lost, rendering them useless for submarines. Russia has fired a submarine-fired 3M14K Kalibr missile at Syrian soil using its torpedo tubes. Smaller Borei-class SSBNs, as well as older Delta-class boats, operate as nuclear deterrence patrols. Russian naval officers have proposed retrofitting two decommissioned Typhoon SSGN submarines with cruise missiles and mines rather than ballistic missiles. Each of these submarine’s dimensions enables it to arm each with at least 200 cruise missiles, he stated. Russian Vice-Admiral Oleg Burtsev revealed plans to take two Typhoon-class ballistic submarines and load them with hundreds of cruise missiles. naval forces in the event of a nuclear war. The missiles were intended to be used to attack U.S. The submarines were designed to be armed with 20 nuclear-tipped R-39 missiles, each with a range of 8,000 kilometers.
The Typhoon class was the largest class of submarine ever built, with a displacement of 48,000 tons.
In the early 1990s, the Soviet Union began decommissioning its Typhoon- class submarines.
0 kommentar(er)
